The 9/11 - Was it really Osama Bin Laden?
- Published September 11th, 2006 in /dev/random
Precisely five years ago a disgrace happened over the USA. Four commercial airplanes were supposely hijacked by terrorists and originated the death of more than five thousand people.
Well, I had my doubts and now, after watching the Loose Change documentary I don’t have any doubts left. There were a terrorist attack — but the attacker, contrary to what’s announced, was not Osame Bin Laden in behalf of Al Qaeda and the Jihad but rather the US Government.
There is clear evidence regarding this theory (I refuse to call it conspiracy anymore). Too numerous to quote here. I suggest watching the documentary at the website. It’s based on facts and not on speculation. A bunch of strange happenings took place right before the attacks. Some important people were advised not to fly that day, American Airlines stocks were sold 11 times more the usual before the attacks had commenced amongst several other issues supporting this theory. I do not believe in coincidence.
I shall no more believe that the 9/11 attack was conducted by Al Qaeda but rather by other terrorists — the American Government.
If you ever read this please question what you’ve heard and try being logical. Watch the documentary. If you, like me, perceive the severity of what really happened please don’t stand still. Write it down on your diary, on your blog. Tell to your friends and to your parents. Let people doubt…
You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. Remember — all I am offering is the truth, nothing more.
There is a revised 2nd Edition of “Loose Change” on Google Video that was released not long ago.
Marco,
That’s precisely the one I was referring to and which I saw on the TV (RTP1). Thanks for pointing that out.
Yes, very cool. I also found it quite interesting to visit the site http://www.physics911.net/ after seeing the documentary (a site about 911 inconsistencies from the “law of physics” point of view).
I’m still surprised on how easy it was for me to believe that one could talk on a cellular phone on a flying plane. I never did it, never saw anyone do it, so why did it seem so natural? (it’s true that now it’s possible to talk on a flying plane due to some new technology, but still … never did it and never saw anyone do it).
The thing is, with all the theories that sprung after 9/11, it’s easy for the republicans to dismiss them as paranoia. Sorta like the JFK assassination theories. And while i have friends in the US and am generally concerned with the global consequences of the US government’s actions, i’m growing a bit tired of hearing about 9/11, especially when there are tragedies and problems going on right now that deserve much more attention. I say, let the US solve their own problems.
Well Rob, the problem being that in behalf of the supposed terrorism acts that happened on th 9/11 the American Government no mores confines to its territory. It has attacked Afeghanistan, Iraque and so on and so forth.
So it’s not only the americans that are at stake. Everyone on this planet can suffer from the American Government too.
It’s time to stop them. The Europe as the grand-father of the world should held responsibilities for pursuing the truth.
Well, the question is, in law there is something called “reasonable doubt”. If 1/10 of those facts are true, then i guess “reasonable doubt” can be applied to force a decent investigation. Or… we’ll never know.
5 years is time enough to be more calm and think about facts and investigations. If there’s a matter that needs investigation, i think 9/11 would be on top of the list. We saw what Spanish government tried to do in March/11. The Press took a very important step to clear things out, investigating.
There are a lot of stupid people that go along polititians stupid talk to cover whatever. They usually go to the heart nationalism talk. But there are someother that need to feel evidence to believe. This is a case where evidence must be very well visible.
This should not happen again. Nowhere in the entire world. Long live the true and pure american way where good people do good things.
Listen, i do acknowledge that their actions have consequences all over the world, and i feel strongly about the US and their creations (i’m talking about cinema, music and literature, but obviously not all of it). But i really don’t agree with the we’re-the-police-of-the-world stand they’ve been taking, it seems to me that they’re trying to hang to a feeling that seems outdated (which started circa WWII). Right now there’s a world of nations, and if Humanity wants to keep going forward we need to “think global, act local”. The way we have to make a difference is to pressure our local governments, alert them of the local impact other’s actions can have. But, in Portugal, that seems just like a child’s dream. Especially when public awareness isn’t promoted.
You guys are kidding right?!?
Of course cell phones work on airplanes, there is no magic involved when a cellphone would have worked in the buildings they crashed into. The only problems for cellphones is altitude, which was alleviated by the hijackers.
As far as the government organizing it, sure, lets assume they could. For heavens sake they can’t hide an oil scandal, a nuclear missile technology scandal, or even a lowly $9,000 relocate construction assignment scandal, they can’t even hide a lets feel up little kids scandal, how could they hide a massive scandal like this. But nevermind that lets assume they could. Why would they?
Is it the Mean old Republicans trying to gain some politcal sway? No, a giant terrorist attack could just as easily been seen as weakness, not to mentioned the horribly mishandled press. The bush administration is not smart enough to spin the Iraq occupation into a positive light(more small business are started in iraw each day than soldiers die, spinning this into a positive should be easy), which should be trivial, if they can’t do that how could they plan something as difficult as 9/11. There is no viable motive for that course of action from our government.
I don’t like Bush much either, but he didn’t kill Americans on 911.